Continuous discovery and risk-based prioritization at scale.

Vulnerability Assessment Services

We run continuous vulnerability programs that go beyond CVSS, prioritizing by exploitability, asset criticality and active exploitation, so engineering teams fix what matters and ignore what does not.

EPSSKEVRisk-basedContinuousAsset-aware
Service · Infivit
Vulnerability Assessment
Production-grade
GitHub-native delivery
90%+
noise-to-signal reduction
<24h
critical-CVE exposure mapping
<7d
mean time to remediate critical
24/7
continuous coverage
Our vulnerability assessment approach

Fix the 5% that matters; ignore the 95% that does not.

A typical enterprise has hundreds of thousands of open CVEs at any moment. CVSS-only triage tells engineering teams to "fix every critical", which is impossible, demoralizing and counterproductive. Real attackers exploit a tiny fraction of CVEs, the ones that are actively exploited, on assets that are actually exposed, with realistic exploit paths. Our approach combines exploitability data (EPSS), known-exploitation status (KEV) and asset criticality so the prioritization reflects real risk, not theoretical severity. The team fixes fewer vulnerabilities; the organization is dramatically more secure.

Risk, not severity

CVSS is one input among many. EPSS, KEV and asset criticality reshape priority so we fix what attackers actually use.

Continuous, not periodic

New vulnerabilities are disclosed every day; new exploits are weaponized hourly. A quarterly scan misses the most dangerous window.

Engineering empathy

Findings come with remediation, ownership and SLA, not just a CSV dump. Engineering teams trust the queue and ship the fixes.

Why this matters now

Why traditional vulnerability management is broken.

Three forces are forcing every mature security program to rebuild its vulnerability practice from the ground up.

28,000+
CVEs disclosed in 2024 alone

Disclosure volume is doubling every 4-5 years. CVSS-only triage is mathematically impossible at this scale; risk-based prioritization is the only realistic path.

<3%
of CVEs ever exploited in the wild

EPSS data shows the vast majority of CVEs never see exploit code. Treating all CVEs equally wastes 97% of remediation effort.

60 days
industry mean time to remediate criticals

Attackers weaponize new exploits in days; defenders patch in months. Risk-based programs close that gap by focusing engineering effort where it matters.

Services we ship

Vulnerability Assessment services we offer.

Each item below is a discrete, measurable workstream we own end-to-end, with senior engineers, real timelinesand the test coverage to back it up.

Continuous vulnerability scanning

Authenticated and unauthenticated scans across infrastructure, web, cloud and container surfaces. Daily delta reports, not quarterly snapshots.

Risk-based prioritization

CVSS is just one input. We layer EPSS (exploit-prediction), KEV (known-exploited) and asset criticality so engineering teams fix the 5% of vulns that actually matter.

Asset inventory and exposure mapping

Living asset inventory with internet-exposure mapping. We know which IPs are public, which apps are critical, which databases hold PII.

Threat-intelligence integration

Active-exploitation feeds, dark-web monitoring and threat-actor TTP correlation. Today's news flips tomorrow's priority list.

Remediation orchestration

Findings routed to the right team with the right remediation guidance. SLA tracking, escalation and automated retest verification.

Executive risk reporting

CISO and board-ready risk dashboards. Trend reporting, MTTR metrics and exposure-curve analysis presented in business terms.

Tech stack

We're fluent in your stack.

Vendor-agnostic by design. We pick the right tool for the problem in front of us, not the one our partner discounts apply to.

Tenable Nessus
Qualys VMDR
Rapid7 InsightVM
Wiz
CrowdStrike Spotlight
Snyk
Trivy
EPSS
CISA KEV
Vulnerability Disclosure Program tooling
Where we've shipped this

Real engagements. Real numbers.

Manufacturing

Cut vulnerability backlog by 92% in 6 months

Risk-based prioritization meant 92% of "critical" CVEs were de-prioritized correctly (no exploit, low asset risk). Engineers shipped fixes for the 8% that mattered, MTTR dropped 6×.

92%
backlog reduction
Why teams pick Infivit for Vulnerability Assessment

Six reasons enterprises run Vulnerability Assessment with Infivit.

Built for the 2026 reality of Vulnerability Assessment: the actual buyer pain, the actual technical constraints and the actual outcomes that matter, not generic security marketing fluff.

5%
Risk, not severity

EPSS + KEV + asset context, not CVSS alone.

CVSS is just one signal. We combine exploit-prediction, active-exploitation feeds and asset criticality to surface the 5% of vulns that actually matter, ignore the 95% that do not.

<4h
Continuous, not periodic

Daily scans, sub-day exposure mapping.

New vulnerabilities are disclosed every day. We map your exposure to a new critical CVE within hours, not at the next quarterly scan window.

90%
Backlog, slashed

90%+ noise-to-signal reduction.

Most "critical" CVEs are not actually risky for your environment. Risk-based prioritization typically removes 90%+ of the backlog, engineering teams ship fewer, more impactful fixes.

Engineering empathy

Findings routed with remediation guidance.

Every finding lands in the right team's queue with concrete remediation guidance and an SLA. Engineering trusts the queue and ships the fixes; ticket-tennis ends.

Exposure mapping

We know what is internet-facing.

Asset inventory + attack-surface mapping. The same critical CVE matters very differently on a public bastion vs an internal admin tool. We score accordingly.

Compliance, satisfied

PCI, SOC 2, ISO mapping included.

Vulnerability management programs mapped to compliance requirements. Auditors get the reports they need; engineering does not have to redo the work twice.

FAQ

The questions you were already going to ask.

Those are scanners. We layer prioritization (EPSS, KEV, asset criticality), workflow (routing, SLA, retest) and reporting on top, plus the human work of tuning, exception handling and engineering partnership.

Got a vulnerability assessment problem?
Let's ship the fix.

A 30-minute call with one of our senior engineers, no slideware, no scoping doc. You leave with a concrete view of what the first 30 days look like.

No NDA needed for first call
Senior engineer on the line
Replies in <24h, business days